Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Page: Aes Sedai of the White Ajah"
From Tar Valon Library
m |
Toral Delvar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think that's for each group to do as they prefer, as with the rest of the community pages. I know on the Blue page those that have been absent since forever aren't listed, but those that only have been absent a year or so are still there. Don't remember how the other groups do. -Zim | I think that's for each group to do as they prefer, as with the rest of the community pages. I know on the Blue page those that have been absent since forever aren't listed, but those that only have been absent a year or so are still there. Don't remember how the other groups do. -Zim | ||
| + | |||
| + | Zim has it. | ||
| + | We try to give a lot of freedom to how the communities arrange their pages and how they link to each other. Usually the only think I do is categorise.--[[User:Toral Delvar|Toral, Department Director and subsupreme overlord]] 01:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 1 April 2012
Just a random question for the boss type persons (it popped up when browsing this page): should absent Aes Sedai still be listed on this page or should they be removed? --Loira Al'Ramoidra 21:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
I think that's for each group to do as they prefer, as with the rest of the community pages. I know on the Blue page those that have been absent since forever aren't listed, but those that only have been absent a year or so are still there. Don't remember how the other groups do. -Zim
Zim has it. We try to give a lot of freedom to how the communities arrange their pages and how they link to each other. Usually the only think I do is categorise.--Toral, Department Director and subsupreme overlord 01:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
