Difference between revisions of "Talk:Staff Positions (Time Served)"
Toral Delvar (talk | contribs) |
Toral Delvar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| − | Er, cause | + | Er, cause Loira had 35 with 6 months as heart and I took 5 off that and added on 4 as Historian |
Revision as of 19:16, 20 February 2011
I don't know the best way to account for people who hold two staff positions at once - count time in both, or just count each month once?
Also, best way to organise? By role, or chronologically?
Chronologically, I think. And I'd say counting time for both... but I'm not sure if that's "correct".. didn't we have some discussion about that regarding the merit badges and decided position/time served that overlaps shouldn't be counted twice? Maybe that doesn't matter in the Library though. ((ps: congrats on the baby!!)) --Loira Al'Ramoidra 18:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
From the way the merits eventually went, more than one position will count twice
I edited your entry for time currently served, not to include time not yet served
why is it 29 months though? even not including time not yet served, it's 30 :p
I thought 6+6+6+6+6+4+1 was 35? *confused*
Er, cause Loira had 35 with 6 months as heart and I took 5 off that and added on 4 as Historian
